cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets

cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights while respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided via the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking from the present case. In this kind of circumstances, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, when it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it really is actually fairly imprecise about whether the 90-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the 90-working day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to perform absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade in the accused hasn't been conducted yet. In the instant case, now the accused tried to acquire advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture of the petitioner was widely circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity of the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for your witness to discover the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and made images. Other than, the images shown about the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity right until he was put up for an identification parade. Making photos in the accused publically, either by showing the same to your witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or program, would create doubt while in the proceedings in the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make certain that there is not any likelihood for your witness to begin to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or even the press or electronic media. Provided the reasons elaborated earlier mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.

The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques employed by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological aspects allows for any more complete legal response.

Permit’s concentrate on what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.

whether whilst granting promotion senior employees were considered for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

nine.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

This case has been cited in quite a few subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, as well as the rule of regulation.

In a few jurisdictions, case regulation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.

this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion with the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

Because of this, only citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this sort of neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving throughout the community seeking to find their phone is likely for being more frustrating than it’s well worth.

fourteen. In the light of your position explained earlier mentioned, it's concluded that a civil servant check here includes a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be viewed as for no fault of his own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency while in the length of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more